Screenshot_1

Wikipedia

Wikipedia has its critics, that’s for sure. It’s far from perfect. The nature of the beast that it is guarantees that there will controversial additions to articles. I’ve been the source of a flaw once. I had used Wikipedia to research a chap that I had written about –  Joey Deacon. A few months later I started getting a ton of hits from Wiki. Someone had decided that my post on Joey Deacon should be listed as a source. The credit has since been removed. More sources are usually a bit better.

But as a free resource of general knowledge about everything, it can’t be beat. It’s awesome. Don’t like the bias of an article? Well go through the sources. If nothing else it’s a platform upon which to start your research. How much do I like Wikipedia? A lot. I think they claim to be amongst the top five most popular websites in the world. They are definitely one of my own top ten most used websites. The other nine? At a guess, WordPress, BBC, Facebook, Google, Feedly, Gmail, Amazon, Flickr and YouTube. At a guess.

I like Wikipedia enough to donate. Just £3 mind you. I’m a tight fisted so and so. But some things are worth a moment of thought, and a dip into one’s pocket. Seriously, I’ve had my money’s worth from the site. And some. The very nice peeps at Wiki also sent me a generic email of thanks, which I have pasted below. It explains the whats, whys, hows and buts. It also tells me that I am FANTASTIC, which is quite frankly something that is not mentioned enough and is worth £3 all by itself… :)

Screenshot_1

Dear Gary,

You are so fantastic. THANK YOU for supporting the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that runs Wikipedia and its sister projects.

Your donation covers not only your own costs of using Wikipedia, but also the costs of other Wikipedia readers.

Like the retired farmer in upstate New York who’s using Wikipedia to study the science of sludge, and the student in Kuala Lumpur who’s researching organic chemistry. The British mechanic who, after he broke his back in an accident, used Wikipedia to retrain himself as a web developer. The civil servant in Finland who set up an offline version of Wikipedia for a small school in Ghana. And the father in Mexico City who takes his little daughters to the museum on weekends, and uses Wikipedia to help them understand everything they’re seeing there.

Wikipedia’s job is to bring the sum total of all human knowledge to everyone around the world in their own language. That’s a pretty audacious mission, but with 30 million articles and 287 languages, I’d say that thanks to you and people like you, we are getting there.

On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, and the half-a-billion other Wikipedia readers around the world: thank you. The fact that you are helping to pay the costs of running Wikipedia means it can stay ad-free and independent of bias, focused solely on helping its readers. Exactly as it should be.

You may have noticed that for the first time this year we’ve tweaked our fundraising so that most people will only see the banners a handful of times, instead of for weeks. That’s deliberate: we don’t want people to get irritated by too many appeals. But it does mean that fewer people will figure out we’re a non-profit, and that we want their help. So if you’re willing, I’d appreciate if you’d help spread the word by forwarding this e-mail to a few of your friends.

And I’d love if you’d try joining us in helping to write Wikipedia. Wikipedia’s written entirely by volunteers — tens of thousands of ordinary people around the world, exactly like us. If you see a typo or a small mistake on Wikipedia, please fix it. If you know anything worth adding, please add it. Some people find it remarkably satisfying, and maybe you will too.

Thank you again. I very much appreciate your trust in us, and I promise you: we will use your money carefully and well.

Thanks,
Sue

About these ads

2 comments

  1. I contributed $5 US. And evidently am also fantastic. They must have forgotten last year when one of their idiot moderators felt they certainly were more knowledeable than I am and threated to ban me. And all because I wanted to add Valentina Lisitsa’s recording of the Rachmaninoff Conerto 3 to their list of significant recordings. So much for real democracy. As the accuracy of Wikipedia improves, so does the fascism.

    BTW WordPress doesn’t seem to recognize me when I am on WordPress Mobile and visit your blog. It wan’t my name and email address. Just FYI.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s